Minnesota Votes

2005 House Bill 1 (Public Safety Omnibus Bill)

[Comments on this legislation] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

  • Introduced by Rep. Jim Abeler, Rep. Michael Beard, Rep. Fran Bradley, Rep. Laura Brod, Rep. Tony Cornish, Rep. Lloyd Cybart, Rep. Randy Demmer, Rep. Tom Emmer, Rep. Sondra Erickson, Rep. Brad Finstad, Rep. Pat Garofalo, Rep. Paul Gazelka, Rep. Bob Gunther, Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, Rep. Joe Hoppe, Rep. Paul Kohls, Rep. Morrie Lanning, Rep. John Lesch, Rep. Doug Magnus, Rep. Doug Meslow, Rep. Peter Nelson, Rep. Erik Paulsen, Rep. Maxine Penas, Rep. Joyce Peppin, Rep. Connie Ruth, Rep. Char Samuelson, Rep. Dan Severson, Rep. Dean Simpson, Rep. Steve Smith, Rep. Barb Sykora, Rep. Kathy Tingelstad, Rep. Tim Wilkin and Rep. Kurt Zellers on January 6, 2005, to amend laws pertaining to sex offender crimes and sentences. Among the changes that the bill makes, this bill: 1) imposes a life sentence penalty for most first-degree criminal sexual conduct crimes, 2) creates indeterminate sentences and mandatory life sentences for second-degree criminal sexual conduct and certain third- and fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct crimes, 3) prohibits inmates serving life sentences for sex crimes from being given supervised release, 4) creates a criminal sexual predatory conduct crime where the person commits a predatory crime motivated by the offender's sexual impulses. A person convicted under this provision would serve a minimum term of double the minimum for the same crime minus the sexual impulse motivation, 5) provides that persons who are released from prison for intermidiate sentences for sex crimes would be subject to conditional release for the remainder of their life, 6) establishes minimum sentences for certain other sex offenses, 7) establishes the Minnesota Sex Offender Review Board; provides procedures for operation of the review board; and specifies when an offender may petition for conditional release, 8) directs the Sentencing Guidelines Commission to assess risk levels and presumptive sentences for certain offenses and requires the commissioner of corrections to establish criteria and procedures for reviewing offenders' petitions for release, and 9) specifies that the Open Meeting Law does not apply to meetings and hearings of the Minnesota Sex Offender Review Board (SF609 Companion Bill).
    • Referred to the House Government Operations and Veterans Affairs Committee on January 6, 2005.
    • Motion by Rep. Kurt Zellers on January 10, 2005, to add Representative Cornish as author of HF1. The motion passed in the House by voice vote on January 10, 2005.
    • Reported by Rep. Kathy Tingelstad on February 3, 2005, from the Committee on Governmental Operations and Veterans Affairs with technical changes and the recommendation that the bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Elections. The report was adopted.
    • Motion by Rep. Kurt Zellers on March 29, 2005, that HF1 be recalled from the Civil Law and Elections Committee and re-referred to the Public Safety Policy and Finance Committee. The motion passed in the House by voice vote on March 29, 2005.
    • Motion by Rep. Kurt Zellers on April 13, 2005, to show the name of Representative Smith as chief author of HF1. The motion passed in the House by voice vote on April 13, 2005.
    • Reported by Rep. Steve Smith on April 20, 2005, from the Public Safety Policy and Finance Committee with amendments and the recommendation that the bill pass as amended and be re-referred to the Ways and Means Committee. As reported, all of the provisions of the bill were deleted. As amended, the Public Safety Omnibus bill would make a variety of spending and policy changes to sex offender provisions, fire marshal provisions, emergency communications, law enforcement policy, DNA Collection, Corrections, courts and public defenders, child protection, criminal sentencing, DWI and traffic safety and other general public safety policy. Among the provisions of the bill, this bill would: A) SPENDING: 1) spend $42,547,000 in 2006 and $42,593,000 in 2007 on the Supreme Court, 2) spend $8,189,000 in both 2006 and 2007 on the courts of appeals, 3) spend $8,189,000 in both years on trial courts, 4) spend $726,000 in both years on tax courts, 5) spend $51,000 in 2006 and $45,000 in 2007 on the uniform laws commission, 6) spend $277,000 in both years on the board of judicial standards, 7) spend $59,857,000 in 2006 and $63,112,000 in 2007 on public defense, 8) spend $124,020,000 in 2006 and $114,506,000 in 2007 for the department of public safety, B: SEX OFFENDORS: 1) double the statutory maximum penalty for first- through fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct crimes and creates a new criminal sexual predatory conduct crime, 2) impose a life penalty without the possibility of release on certain first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct offenders in situations where one or more aggravating factors are present, 3) create an indeterminate sentencing system for certain criminal sexual conduct offenses; under this system, a court must sentence an individual subject to this penalty to a minimum of 20 years imprisonment, unless some other provision of law requires a longer sentence, and a maximum penalty of life. The individual is eligible for release by the Sex Offender Review Board after the person has served the minimum sentence. If the person is released, the person remains on supervised release for life. This penalty applies to first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct crimes committed with force, violence, coercion, use of a weapon, or where personal injury results to the victim. This penalty also applies to a repeat sex offender, 4) impose lifetime conditional release for repeat sex offenders and amends certain statutes covering issues of criminal sexual conduct and harassment, 5) require the Sentencing Guidelines Commission to create a separate sentencing guidelines grid for sex offenses, increase presumptive sentences and change the manner in which criminal history scores are calculated for sex offenses, 6) establishe a Sex Offender Policy Board, which is charged with developing professional standards for treatment of sex offenders and a Sex Offender Review Board, 7) create a Supreme Court Task Force to study the use of the courts to handle cases involving sexually dangerous persons, 8) clarify the procedures individuals who lack a primary address (i.e., are homeless) must follow if they are required to register under the Predatory Offender Registration Law (POR Law), 9) amend the community notification law and imposes notification, information sharing, and investigation obligations on the BCA, DOC, and local law enforcement authorities in relation to individuals who enter Minnesota from another state. It also sets up procedures to ensure that offenders from other states are subject to community notification under Minnesota law, 10) require level III sex offenders to have their photos taken every six months, 11) require courts to impose lifetime conditional release on level III sex offenders who are convicted of failing to register, 12) establish background checks on workers who work in facilities licensed by the Department of Human Services, C) GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY; 1) authorizes fees for Internet searches on the BCA's criminal history database, 2) modify the Youth Intervention Program and transfers responsibility for the program from DEED to DPS, 2) permit installation of vehicle-monitoring devices in authorized emergency vehicles, 3) modify provisions and procedures pertaining to insurance benefits for disabled police and firefighters, 4) modify name change application procedures, 5) authorize the release of information maintained in the predatory offender database in conjunction with background checks for juvenile and adult offenders, 6) authorize the BCA to add information onto a person's criminal history under certain circumstances, 7) prohibit employer retaliation against victims who take time off work to attend hearings and proceedings. 8) clarify notification procedures when a victim of criminal sexual conduct requests HIV testing of the perpetrator, 9) expand eligibility for crime victims' reparations, 10) and authorizes the transfer of unused special revenue funds to the general fund, D) FIRE MARSHAL, 1) delete the requirement that the state fire marshal inform the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension whenever the cause of a fire is determined to be arson, replacing it with a requirement to so inform the law enforcement authority having jurisdiction, typically at the local level of government, 2) remove the reimbursement to political subdivisions for a portion of the salary costs and the expenses incurred by police officers and firefighters attending arson investigation training offered by the state fire marshal's arson training unit, 3) remove the authority of the state fire marshal to delegate summons authority to fire departments in cities of the first and second class, 4) establish a new per-room fire inspection fee schedule for lodging facilities. The proposal calls for a $7 per-room fee for facilities with 35 to 99 units or 50 cents per-bed in group sleeping areas. These fees are on top of the base fee of $435, 5) establish a new fee schedule for lodging facilities with less than 35 rooms, 6) impose a triennial inspection fee of $217.50 and a per-room charge of $3 for a hotel or dormitory and a per-cabin charge of $2.50, or a per-bed charge of 50 cents per bed in group sleeping areas and permit a follow-up charge of $112.50, 7) exempt two-person backpacking tents from the requirement that tents be durably flame resistant. E) LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICY, 1) authorize the commissioner of public safety and political subdivisions to reimburse peace officers up to $600 for the purchase of bulletproof vests, 2) establish a Gang and Drug Oversight Council; establishment of the MN Financial Crimes Oversight Council, 3) establish a human trafficking study and assessment, 4) require sheriffs, peace officers, and community correction agencies operating juvenile detention facilities to take fingerprints, photographs, and other identification data on persons involved in the criminal justice process, on probation, on parole, or in custody who have a suspense file, F) DNA COLLECTION, 1) establish an all felon DNA database in Minnesota. Requires all persons convicted of a felony to submit a DNA sample, 2) require persons arrested for a felony to submit a DNA sample, 3) provide data privacy protection to DNA samples and records, and establishes grounds for expunging DNA samples, and 4) require law enforcement to maintain DNA samples for the period of time the subject of the sample is under sentence, G) CORRECTIONS, 1) establish a disciplinary procedure for correctional officers, 2) allow the commissioner of corrections, with the approval of the local authority, to place an offender who is committed to the custody of the commissioner and who has less than 180 days remaining in the offender's term of imprisonment at a county or regional jail in the jurisdiction where the offender plans to reside while on supervised release, 3) add "supervised release" to the list of offenders eligible for $100 gate money to be paid by the warden or chief executive officer upon leaving prison, 4) allow for local corrections fees, 5) authorize the Fugitive Apprehension Unit to seize property under the forfeiture law with specific limitations, H) COURTS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS, 1) increase criminal surcharges and recording surcharges to be used to fund civil legal services, 2) permit Ramsey County to impose an additional $1 surcharge to fund the petty misdemeanor diversion program, 3) limit representation by public defenders to statutorily designated persons, 4) limit the discretionary appointment of public defenders by the court, 5) place a two-year limitation period on filing a petition for postconviction relief, 6) allow the public defender to access the network to obtain the criminal record of a witness including having access to data stored via CriMNet or other methods, 7) allow a person to file a petition with the court for the return of seized property if not returned in 48 hours, H) CHILD PROTECTION, 1) require the commissioner must consent to the adoption if there is no parent qualified to consent, 2) state that a consent to adopt is irrevocable following notice to both parents of the effect of the consent and acceptance by the court, unless the court finds the consent was obtained by fraud, 3) require a background check for: a) a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent who is being assessed for providing day-to-day care of a child who has been temporarily or permanently removed from the home of a parent or guardian under the child protection statutes, b) a relative whose suitability for placement is being established and any household member over the age of 13 when the relative must be licensed for foster care; the agency must conduct a background study under the adoption statute, c) a parent following out-of-home placement when the agency has reasonable cause to believe the parent has been convicted of a crime related to the parent's ability to maintain the child's health, safety, or welfare; or the parent is the subject of a investigation, I) SENTENCING, increases the presumptive range of sentences allowable under the sentencing guidelines without a departure, establishes procedures to govern a jury's finding of aggravating factors and the court's imposition of an upward departure, and deletes language in various statutes that refers to the court being able to impose a longer sentence on its own, J) GENERAL CRIMINAL POLICIES, 1) increase the penalties for sale and possession of steroids regulating them as schedule III rather than a schedule IV drugs, 2) require Driver's license suspension for 30 days when defendant convicted of gasoline theft, 3) make it a gross misdemeanor to posses a dog or bird that is to be used in cock fights, dog fights, and the like. Those types of animal fights are already illegal, and this bill would extend prohibition to the possession of the animals in question, 4) make a felony to strangle a member of your family or household, punishable by up to five years in prison and/or a $5,000 fine, 5) expand the enhanced crime of causing death while committing child abuse to include child abuse to any child, not just the child the person killed, 6) extend the fourth-degree assault laws that currently cover acts of violence against correctional employees to include violence against other other individuals who provide care or treatment at a secure treatment facility, 7) make it a felony crime for a gang member to committ a crime against a child, 8) create new penalties for the crime of negelecting a vulnerable adult. If neglect results in the death of a vulnerable adult the punishment would be up to 15 years in prison and or up to a $30,000 fine, If the neglect results in "great bodily harm," the punishment would be up to ten years in prison and/or a fine up to $20,000, If the neglect results in "substantial bodily harm or the risk of death," the punishment would be prison up to five years and/or up to a $10,000 fine, In other cases, the punishment would be up to one year in prison and/or up to a $3,000 fine, 9) impose criminal penalties for leaving a child eight years of age or younger in a car not supervised by someone who is at least 14 if the conditions are not safe, if the car is running, or if the keys are in the car. Violation would result in a charge of child neglect, punishable by 90 days in jail and a $1000 fine, 10) establish a misdemeanor crime for nonvehicular evasion of a police officer for the purpose of avoiding arrest, detention, or investigation, or in order to conceal or destroy potential evidence, 11) make it a crime to interfere or obstruct a member of an ambulance service personnel crew who is providing, or attempting to provide, emergency care, 12) establish penalties for providing false information to police. First time offenders would be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. A person who is convicted a second or subsequent time would be guilty of a felony and could be sentenced to prison for up to two years or fined up to $4,000, or both, 13) expand the crime of theft to include taking something that a person has a legal property interest in if the individual that he or she takes it from has a superior interest in the property, 14) prohibit the electronic (email or website) use of false pretenses to obtain the identity of another person. Whoever commits such offense could be sentenced to imprisonment for up to five years or to payment of a fine of up to $10,000, or both, 15) establish a minimum restitution requirement of $1,000 for victims of identity theft, 16) expand tresspass laws to make it illegal to return to property at any time after being told to leave (under current law, it isn't tresspass if a person returns after a specified period of time depending on the situation), 17) make it a crime with up to a $10,000 fine for a railroad or a person employed by a railroad to obstruct the treatment of a railroad worker injured on the job or to discipline or threaten to discipline the railroad employee injured on the job for requesting treatment or first aid, 18) prohibit the use of audiovisual recording devices in motion picture theaters and make the act of doing so a crime with the first offense a misdemeanor; the second, a gross misdemeanor; the third, a felony, 19) establish a state committee to study the dollar threshold for property crimes, K) DWI and TRAFFIC SAFETY, 1) prohibit the use of traffic signal-override devices except those authorized by the commissioner of public safety. Violation would be a misdemeanor, 2) require drivers to restrain child passengers under nine years of age weighing less than 80 pounds (rather than those under four years of age) in a vehicle with a child restraint system. The bill lays out restrictions for different ages and weights, 3) delete DWI related offense requirement that 48 hours of jail time be consecutive, 4) exempt law enforcement agencies that forfeit a vehicle involved in an impaired driving offense from the requirement to obtain the vehicle title in its name before selling the vehicle. The bill allows the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to certify chemical tests directly to the public safety department, L) OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (only if HF1664 passes), 1) spend $2 million in both 2006 and 2007 on corrections for meth provisions and short term offenders, and 2) spend $400,000 in 2006 and $100,000 in 2007 for the department of public safety for homelessness grants and youth intervention grants. The report was adopted.
    • Reported by Rep. Jim Knoblach on April 27, 2005, from the Ways and Means Committee with amendments and the recommendation that the bill pass as amended. As amended, $550,000 rather than $2,750,000 would be spent on Meth treatment grants. $550,000 rather than $2,750,000 would be spent on Meth Law Enforcement supervision grants. New provisions relating to inspection fees for hotels and dormatories were deleted. A provision was deleted which would have required drivers to restrain child passengers under nine years of age weighing less than 80 pounds (rather than those under four years of age) in a vehicle with a child restraint system and laid out restrictions for different ages and weights. The report was adopted.
      • Referred to the House Rules and Legislative Administration Committee on April 27, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Phyllis Kahn and Rep. Doug Meslow on April 28, 2005, to make technical changes regarding the retension of biological evidence. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Fran Bradley and Rep. Joyce Peppin on April 28, 2005, to make nonsubstantive changes to the bill. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Doug Meslow, Rep. Erik Paulsen and Rep. Kurt Zellers on April 28, 2005, to require that if the bureau is notified that a person who submitted a biological specimen under this subdivision was found not guilty or otherwise not convicted of an offense, the bureau must destroy the person's biological specimen and return all records to the individual. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Michael Beard on April 28, 2005, to allow for a criminal penalty up to $1,000 (rather than $10,000) for railroad interference with an employees medical treatment for injuries received on the job. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Dan Larson and Rep. Ann Lenczewski on April 28, 2005, to prohibit sex offenders subject to a community notification meeting from attending the meeting. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Michael Beard, Rep. Mark Buesgens, Rep. Brad Finstad, Rep. Rod Hamilton, Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, Rep. Karen Klinzing, Rep. Philip Krinkie, Rep. Denny McNamara, Rep. Scott Newman, Rep. Bud Nornes, Rep. Erik Paulsen, Rep. Connie Ruth, Rep. Marty Seifert, Rep. Ray Vandeveer and Rep. Tim Wilkin on April 28, 2005, to allow for the use of inmates for community service, conservation and maintenance services on state land without regard to state employee provisions in the law which currently prohibit the state and the university systems from using outside services without demonstrating the jobs cannot be done with state employees. The amendment passed in the House (84 to 48) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Mary Murphy, Rep. Michael Paymar and Rep. Steve Smith on April 28, 2005, to establish mandatory fire inspections with fees for hotels and dormitories with fewer than 35 rooms (establishments with fewer than 35 rooms are exempt under current law). The amendment failed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Scott Newman on April 28, 2005, to creates a rebuttable presumption that a dog is or has been trained for fighting if the dog exhibits wounds AND (rather than or as in the bill prior to amendment) scars or the person has training apparatus used to prepare dogs for fights. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, Rep. Doug Meslow and Rep. Erik Paulsen on April 28, 2005, to require law enforcement to notify a juvenile's parents or guardian prior to taking a biological specimen. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Keith Ellison on April 28, 2005, to remove from midemeanor vagrancy crimes a) persons over 18 with the ability to work, without lawful means of support and not seeking employment, and b) those who derive support from begging or as a fortune teller or "similar imposter" (it is currently a misdemeanor to do either). The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Laura Brod, Rep. Tony Cornish, Rep. Lloyd Cybart, Rep. Matt Dean, Rep. Chris DeLaForest, Rep. Tom Emmer, Rep. Brad Finstad, Rep. Paul Gazelka, Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, Rep. Paul Kohls, Rep. Scott Newman, Rep. Mark Olson, Rep. Joyce Peppin, Rep. Neil W. Peterson, Rep. Dan Severson, Rep. Ray Vandeveer and Rep. Kurt Zellers on April 28, 2005, to allow a court to sentence certain sex offenders (i.e., preferential pedophiles) to chemical castration when certain aggravating circumstances are present. Permits sex offenders to volunteer for castration. Both mandatory and voluntary castration are at the offender's expense. The amendment passed in the House (80 to 54) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
    • Amendment offered by Rep. David Dill, Rep. Doug Magnus, Rep. Tom Rukavina and Rep. Dean Simpson on April 28, 2005, to require, for DWI punishments, that a license restriction requiring a person to abstain from alcohol be removed if 10 years have passed without an impaired driving conviction. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Rob Eastlund, Rep. Keith Ellison, Rep. Sondra Erickson, Rep. Michael Paymar and Rep. Judy Soderstrom on April 28, 2005, to establish a "Corrections Board" to keep in communication with all of those on parole and their employers. The Board would have the power at its discretion to grant final discharge from confinement.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Mary Murphy and Rep. Steve Smith on April 28, 2005, to deleted almost all of the amendment and require that $30,000 be spent on a working group to study sentencing guidelines. The amendment passed in the House (94 to 39) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Carlos Mariani on April 28, 2005, to require that the working group set up by the Smith/Murphy amendment include representatives from the Council on Black Minnesotans, the Councils on Affairs of Chicano/Latino People, the Council on Asian-Pacific Minnesotans and the Council on Indian Affairs. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005, to deleted almost all of the amendment and require that $30,000 be spent on a working group to study sentencing guidelines (made up of members of a number of specific organizations).
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Karen Clark, Rep. Keith Ellison, Rep. Sheldon Johnson, Rep. Carlos Mariani, Rep. Joe Mullery, Rep. Cy Thao and Rep. Neva Walker on April 28, 2005, to require that each county report to the legislature the concentration of level three sex offenders in any neighborhood(s) of the county. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Irv Anderson, Rep. Kent Eken, Rep. Bernie Lieder, Rep. Joe Mullery and Rep. Loren Solberg on April 28, 2005, to require the Department of Public Safety to disregard, for purposes of eligibility for a limited driver's license, any first-time (only) impaired driving violation from more than ten years earlier, if the person has had no repeat impaired driving violation within that ten-year lookback period. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Joe Atkins, Rep. Laura Brod, Rep. Mark Buesgens, Rep. Tony Cornish, Rep. Lloyd Cybart, Rep. Chris DeLaForest, Rep. Tom Emmer, Rep. Brad Finstad, Rep. Paul Gazelka, Rep. Joe Hoppe, Rep. Scott Newman, Rep. Mark Olson, Rep. Duke Powell, Rep. Marty Seifert, Rep. Tim Wilkin and Rep. Kurt Zellers on April 28, 2005, to require the issuance of predatory offender license plates for an additional $10 fee for level three sex offenders. Their driver's license or Minnesota ID cared would also be labeled "predatory offender." Representative Kahn raised a point of order declaring the amendment out of order. The Speaker ruled the amendment in order.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Lyndon Carlson and Rep. Joe Mullery on April 28, 2005, to require the issuance of "armed robber" license plates for a $10 fee for people convicted of armed robbery. Their Minnesota driver's license or ID would have to be marked "armed robber". The amendment failed in the House (26 to 106) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
      • Motion in the House on April 28, 2005, (the second portion of the Emmer amendment, after a request by Representative Juhnke to divide the amendment and vote on the second part first) to require driver's licenses and Minnesota ID cards of level three sex offenders to be marked "predatory offender". The motion passed in the House (121 to 12) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
      • Motion in the House on April 28, 2005, (the first portion of the Emmer amendment, after a request by Representative Juhnke to divide the amendment and vote on the second part first) to require the issuance of predatory offender license plates for an additional $10 fee for level three sex offenders. The motion passed in the House (82 to 51) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
    • The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005, to require the issuance of predatory offender license plates for an additional $10 fee for level three sex offenders. Their driver's license or Minnesota ID cared would also be labeled "predatory offender" (the amendment passed in two parts, each with a separate roll call vote).
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Pat Garofalo, Rep. Bob Gunther, Rep. Tim Mahoney, Rep. Michael Paymar and Rep. Nora Slawik on April 28, 2005, to require licensed day care providers to notify parents considering enrollment if the program employs or has living in the same home any person who is the subject of either a set-aside or varience. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Tom Rukavina and Rep. Loren Solberg on April 28, 2005, to exempt from the criminal surcharge those petty misdemeanor crimes where no fine is imposed. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Debra Hilstrom and Rep. Michael Paymar on April 28, 2005, to decrease the amount of money proposed to be spent on correctional facilities, increase the amount that goes to the department of public safety, and of that shift in funding, designate $250,000 in 2006 and again in 2007 from the money that is currently proposed to be spent on prisons to battered women's shelters. That $250,000 a year would become part of the base level funding. The amendment failed in the House (66 to 67) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Debra Hilstrom, Rep. Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Rep. Mary Ellen Otremba, Rep. Jeanne Poppe and Rep. Andy Welti on April 28, 2005, to decrease proposed funding for prisons by about $750,000 in both 2006 and 2007 and use the money to increase proposed funding for meth treatment grants to counties. The amendment failed in the House (62 to 69) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Philip Krinkie on April 28, 2005, to delete an article which would increase the telecommunications service provider 911 fee and provide funds ($9.5 million from bonds) for elements of the third phase of the statewide public safety radio communication system in the southeast district of the state patrol and the counties of Benton, Sherburne, Stearns and Wright that are of regional or statewide benefit. The amendment failed in the House (20 to 111) on April 28, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
    • Amendment offered by Rep. David Dill on April 28, 2005, to delete a provision which would makes it illegal for a person who is responsible for a child under the age of eight to leave that child in a car without the supervision of at least a 14-year-old when one of two conditions is present. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
    • Amendment offered by Rep. Michael Beard on April 28, 2005, to make a technical, clarifying amendment. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on April 28, 2005.
  • Passed in the House (123 to 10) on April 28, 2005, make a variety of spending and policy changes to sex offender provisions, fire marshal provisions, emergency communications, law enforcement policy, DNA Collection, Corrections, courts and public defenders, child protection, criminal sentencing, DWI and traffic safety and other general public safety policy. Among the provisions of the bill, this bill would: A) SPENDING: 1) spend $42,547,000 in 2006 and $42,593,000 in 2007 on the Supreme Court, 2) spend $8,189,000 in both 2006 and 2007 on the courts of appeals, 3) spend $8,189,000 in both years on trial courts, 4) spend $726,000 in both years on tax courts, 5) spend $51,000 in 2006 and $45,000 in 2007 on the uniform laws commission, 6) spend $277,000 in both years on the board of judicial standards, 7) spend $59,857,000 in 2006 and $63,112,000 in 2007 on public defense, 8) spend $124,020,000 in 2006 and $114,506,000 in 2007 for the department of public safety, B: SEX OFFENDORS: 1) double the statutory maximum penalty for first- through fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct crimes and creates a new criminal sexual predatory conduct crime, 2) impose a life penalty without the possibility of release on certain first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct offenders in situations where one or more aggravating factors are present, 3) create an indeterminate sentencing system for certain criminal sexual conduct offenses; under this system, a court must sentence an individual subject to this penalty to a minimum of 20 years imprisonment, unless some other provision of law requires a longer sentence, and a maximum penalty of life. The individual is eligible for release by the Sex Offender Review Board after the person has served the minimum sentence. If the person is released, the person remains on supervised release for life. This penalty applies to first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct crimes committed with force, violence, coercion, use of a weapon, or where personal injury results to the victim. This penalty also applies to a repeat sex offender, 4) impose lifetime conditional release for repeat sex offenders and amends certain statutes covering issues of criminal sexual conduct and harassment, 5) require the Sentencing Guidelines Commission to create a separate sentencing guidelines grid for sex offenses, increase presumptive sentences and change the manner in which criminal history scores are calculated for sex offenses, 6) establishe a Sex Offender Policy Board, which is charged with developing professional standards for treatment of sex offenders and a Sex Offender Review Board, 7) create a Supreme Court Task Force to study the use of the courts to handle cases involving sexually dangerous persons, 8) clarify the procedures individuals who lack a primary address (i.e., are homeless) must follow if they are required to register under the Predatory Offender Registration Law (POR Law), 9) amend the community notification law and imposes notification, information sharing, and investigation obligations on the BCA, DOC, and local law enforcement authorities in relation to individuals who enter Minnesota from another state. It also sets up procedures to ensure that offenders from other states are subject to community notification under Minnesota law, 10) require level III sex offenders to have their photos taken every six months, 11) require courts to impose lifetime conditional release on level III sex offenders who are convicted of failing to register, 12) establish background checks on workers who work in facilities licensed by the Department of Human Services, 13) allow a court to sentence certain sex offenders (i.e., preferential pedophiles) to chemical castration when certain aggravating circumstances are present. Permits sex offenders to volunteer for castration. Both mandatory and voluntary castration are at the offender's expense, 14) require that each county report to the legislature the concentration of level three sex offenders in any neighborhood(s) of the county, 15) require the issuance of predatory offender license plates for an additional $10 fee for level three sex offenders. Their driver's license or Minnesota ID cared would also be labeled "predatory offender" C) GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY; 1) authorizes fees for Internet searches on the BCA's criminal history database, 2) modify the Youth Intervention Program and transfers responsibility for the program from DEED to DPS, 2) permit installation of vehicle-monitoring devices in authorized emergency vehicles, 3) modify provisions and procedures pertaining to insurance benefits for disabled police and firefighters, 4) modify name change application procedures, 5) authorize the release of information maintained in the predatory offender database in conjunction with background checks for juvenile and adult offenders, 6) authorize the BCA to add information onto a person's criminal history under certain circumstances, 7) prohibit employer retaliation against victims who take time off work to attend hearings and proceedings. 8) clarify notification procedures when a victim of criminal sexual conduct requests HIV testing of the perpetrator, 9) expand eligibility for crime victims' reparations, 10) and authorizes the transfer of unused special revenue funds to the general fund, D) FIRE MARSHAL, 1) delete the requirement that the state fire marshal inform the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension whenever the cause of a fire is determined to be arson, replacing it with a requirement to so inform the law enforcement authority having jurisdiction, typically at the local level of government, 2) remove the reimbursement to political subdivisions for a portion of the salary costs and the expenses incurred by police officers and firefighters attending arson investigation training offered by the state fire marshal's arson training unit, 3) remove the authority of the state fire marshal to delegate summons authority to fire departments in cities of the first and second class, 4) establish a new per-room fire inspection fee schedule for lodging facilities. The proposal calls for a $7 per-room fee for facilities with 35 to 99 units or 50 cents per-bed in group sleeping areas. These fees are on top of the base fee of $435, 5) establish a new fee schedule for lodging facilities with less than 35 rooms, 6) impose a triennial inspection fee of $217.50 and a per-room charge of $3 for a hotel or dormitory and a per-cabin charge of $2.50, or a per-bed charge of 50 cents per bed in group sleeping areas and permit a follow-up charge of $112.50, 7) exempt two-person backpacking tents from the requirement that tents be durably flame resistant. E) LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICY, 1) authorize the commissioner of public safety and political subdivisions to reimburse peace officers up to $600 for the purchase of bulletproof vests, 2) establish a Gang and Drug Oversight Council; establishment of the MN Financial Crimes Oversight Council, 3) establish a human trafficking study and assessment, 4) require sheriffs, peace officers, and community correction agencies operating juvenile detention facilities to take fingerprints, photographs, and other identification data on persons involved in the criminal justice process, on probation, on parole, or in custody who have a suspense file, F) DNA COLLECTION, 1) establish an all felon DNA database in Minnesota. Requires all persons convicted of a felony to submit a DNA sample, 2) require persons arrested for a felony to submit a DNA sample, 3) provide data privacy protection to DNA samples and records, and establishes grounds for expunging DNA samples, and 4) require law enforcement to maintain DNA samples for the period of time the subject of the sample is under sentence, G) CORRECTIONS, 1) establish a disciplinary procedure for correctional officers, 2) allow the commissioner of corrections, with the approval of the local authority, to place an offender who is committed to the custody of the commissioner and who has less than 180 days remaining in the offender's term of imprisonment at a county or regional jail in the jurisdiction where the offender plans to reside while on supervised release, 3) add "supervised release" to the list of offenders eligible for $100 gate money to be paid by the warden or chief executive officer upon leaving prison, 4) allow for local corrections fees, 5) authorize the Fugitive Apprehension Unit to seize property under the forfeiture law with specific limitations, 6) allow for the use of inmates for community service, conservation and maintenance services on state land without regard to state employee provisions in the law which currently prohibit the state and the university systems from using outside services without demonstrating the jobs cannot be done with state employees, H) COURTS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS, 1) increase criminal surcharges and recording surcharges to be used to fund civil legal services, 2) permit Ramsey County to impose an additional $1 surcharge to fund the petty misdemeanor diversion program, 3) limit representation by public defenders to statutorily designated persons, 4) limit the discretionary appointment of public defenders by the court, 5) place a two-year limitation period on filing a petition for postconviction relief, 6) allow the public defender to access the network to obtain the criminal record of a witness including having access to data stored via CriMNet or other methods, 7) allow a person to file a petition with the court for the return of seized property if not returned in 48 hours, H) CHILD PROTECTION, 1) require the commissioner must consent to the adoption if there is no parent qualified to consent, 2) state that a consent to adopt is irrevocable following notice to both parents of the effect of the consent and acceptance by the court, unless the court finds the consent was obtained by fraud, 3) require a background check for: a) a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent who is being assessed for providing day-to-day care of a child who has been temporarily or permanently removed from the home of a parent or guardian under the child protection statutes, b) a relative whose suitability for placement is being established and any household member over the age of 13 when the relative must be licensed for foster care; the agency must conduct a background study under the adoption statute, c) a parent following out-of-home placement when the agency has reasonable cause to believe the parent has been convicted of a crime related to the parent's ability to maintain the child's health, safety, or welfare; or the parent is the subject of a investigation, I) SENTENCING, increases the presumptive range of sentences allowable under the sentencing guidelines without a departure, establishes procedures to govern a jury's finding of aggravating factors and the court's imposition of an upward departure, and deletes language in various statutes that refers to the court being able to impose a longer sentence on its own, J) GENERAL CRIMINAL POLICIES, 1) increase the penalties for sale and possession of steroids regulating them as schedule III rather than a schedule IV drugs, 2) require Driver's license suspension for 30 days when defendant convicted of gasoline theft, 3) make it a gross misdemeanor to posses a dog or bird that is to be used in cock fights, dog fights, and the like. Those types of animal fights are already illegal, and this bill would extend prohibition to the possession of the animals in question, 4) make a felony to strangle a member of your family or household, punishable by up to five years in prison and/or a $5,000 fine, 5) expand the enhanced crime of causing death while committing child abuse to include child abuse to any child, not just the child the person killed, 6) extend the fourth-degree assault laws that currently cover acts of violence against correctional employees to include violence against other other individuals who provide care or treatment at a secure treatment facility, 7) make it a felony crime for a gang member to committ a crime against a child, 8) create new penalties for the crime of negelecting a vulnerable adult. If neglect results in the death of a vulnerable adult the punishment would be up to 15 years in prison and or up to a $30,000 fine, If the neglect results in "great bodily harm," the punishment would be up to ten years in prison and/or a fine up to $20,000, If the neglect results in "substantial bodily harm or the risk of death," the punishment would be prison up to five years and/or up to a $10,000 fine, In other cases, the punishment would be up to one year in prison and/or up to a $3,000 fine, 9) establish a misdemeanor crime for nonvehicular evasion of a police officer for the purpose of avoiding arrest, detention, or investigation, or in order to conceal or destroy potential evidence, 10) make it a crime to interfere or obstruct a member of an ambulance service personnel crew who is providing, or attempting to provide, emergency care, 11) establish penalties for providing false information to police. First time offenders would be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. A person who is convicted a second or subsequent time would be guilty of a felony and could be sentenced to prison for up to two years or fined up to $4,000, or both, 12) expand the crime of theft to include taking something that a person has a legal property interest in if the individual that he or she takes it from has a superior interest in the property, 13) prohibit the electronic (email or website) use of false pretenses to obtain the identity of another person. Whoever commits such offense could be sentenced to imprisonment for up to five years or to payment of a fine of up to $10,000, or both, 14) establish a minimum restitution requirement of $1,000 for victims of identity theft, 15) expand tresspass laws to make it illegal to return to property at any time after being told to leave (under current law, it isn't tresspass if a person returns after a specified period of time depending on the situation), 16) make it a crime with up to a $1,000 fine for a railroad or a person employed by a railroad to obstruct the treatment of a railroad worker injured on the job or to discipline or threaten to discipline the railroad employee injured on the job for requesting treatment or first aid, 17) prohibit the use of audiovisual recording devices in motion picture theaters and make the act of doing so a crime with the first offense a misdemeanor; the second, a gross misdemeanor; the third, a felony, 18) establish a state committee to study the dollar threshold for property crimes, 19) remove from midemeanor vagrancy crimes a) persons over 18 with the ability to work, without lawful means of support and not seeking employment, and b) those who derive support from begging or as a fortune teller or "similar imposter" (it is currently a misdemeanor to do either) K) DWI and TRAFFIC SAFETY, 1) prohibit the use of traffic signal-override devices except those authorized by the commissioner of public safety. Violation would be a misdemeanor, 2) require drivers to restrain child passengers under nine years of age weighing less than 80 pounds (rather than those under four years of age) in a vehicle with a child restraint system. The bill lays out restrictions for different ages and weights, 3) delete DWI related offense requirement that 48 hours of jail time be consecutive, 4) exempt law enforcement agencies that forfeit a vehicle involved in an impaired driving offense from the requirement to obtain the vehicle title in its name before selling the vehicle. The bill allows the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to certify chemical tests directly to the public safety department, 5) require, for DWI punishments, that a license restriction requiring a person to abstain from alcohol be removed if 10 years have passed without an impaired driving conviction, 6) require the Department of Public Safety to disregard, for purposes of eligibility for a limited driver's license, any first-time (only) impaired driving violation from more than ten years earlier, if the person has had no repeat impaired driving violation within that ten-year lookback period, L) OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (only if HF1664 passes), 1) spend $2 million in both 2006 and 2007 on corrections for meth provisions and short term offenders, and 2) spend $400,000 in 2006 and $100,000 in 2007 for the department of public safety for homelessness grants and youth intervention grants. [Vote Details and Comments]
  • Motion by Rep. Steve Smith on May 4, 2005, that the House refuse to agree to the amendments made by the Senate and that a conference committee of 5 members be appointed to work out the differences between the two versions of the bill. The motion passed in the House by voice vote on May 4, 2005.
  • Motion by Rep. Steve Smith on May 23, 2005, that the report of the Conference Committee be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended. As reported, all of the provisions were deleted. As amended, the Public Safety Omnibus bill would make a variety of spending and policy changes to sex offender provisions, fire marshal provisions, emergency communications, law enforcement policy, DNA Collection, Corrections, courts and public defenders, child protection, criminal sentencing, DWI and traffic safety and other general public safety policy. Among the provisions of the bill, this bill would: A) SPENDING; 1) spends $42,196,000 in 2006 and $42,171,000 in 2007 on the Supreme Court, 2) spend $8,189,000 in both 2006 and 2007 on the courts of appeals, 3) spend $231,039,000 in 2006 and $231,386,000 in 2007 on trial courts, 4) spend $726,000 in both years on tax courts, 5) spend $51,000 in 2006 and $45,000 in 2007 on the uniform laws commission, 6) spend $277,000 in both years on the board of judicial standards, 7) spend $60,703,000 in 2006 and $61,801,000 in 2007 on public defense, 8) spend $188,774,000 in 2006 and $126,747,000 in 2007 for the department of public safety, 8) spends $126,000 in both years on the Board of Private Detective and Protective Agent Services, 9) spends $407,085,000 in 2006 and $420,588,000 in 2007 on Corrections, 10) spends $436,000 in both years on sentencing guidelines, and 11) spends $7,000 on the board of veterinary medicine for a meth study, B) SEX OFFENDORS, 1) prohibits the commissioner of corrections from releasing certain other sex offenders until they have served the minimum sentence imposed by the court (usually 20 years in prison). These sex offenders include first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct offenders who commit crimes with force, violence, coercion, use of a weapon, or where personal injury results to the victim and repeat sex offenders, 2) requires the commissioner of corrections to grant supervised release to sex offenders serving life sentences when so directed by the Sex Offender Review Board (SORB), 3) adds the new crime of criminal sexual predatory conduct to the list of crimes that require an offender to serve an additional ten years on conditional release. The statutory maximum would be 25 percent longer for the underlying crime or 50 percent longer if the violation is committed by a person with previous sex offenses. Permits imposition of a fine of not more than $20,000 in addition to any sentence imposed, 4) allows for mandatory life sentences for repeat sex offenders, and egregious first-time offenders if the crime involves "heinour elements" such as torture, intentional infliction of great harm, mutilation, or the use of a dangerous weapon, 5) requires mandatory minimum sentences and specific terms of conditional release, C) SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION, 1) allows programs for adult offenders to include co-payments, and third-party payers, 2) recodifies notification statutes, 3) requires that when a person leaves a primary address and does not have a new one, the person must register with the law enforcement authority in the area where the person is staying within 24 hours of the time the person no longer has a primary address. Requires compliance with this registration process every time the person moves to a new jurisdiction. Requires the person, in lieu of reporting a primary address, to describe the location where the person is staying with as much specificity as possible, 4) requires that, if the person continues to lack a primary address, the person must report in person, on a weekly basis, to the law enforcement agency in the area where the person is staying, 5) requires level II and III predatory offenders who are no longer under correctional supervision to have an annual in-person contact with the law enforcement authority with jurisdiction over where the offender lives, stays or attends school, 6) requires a person who is required to register as a sex offender to notify a health care facility upon the person's admittance to the facility that the person is a registered sex offender, 7) requires a mandatory ten-year conditional release period for released Level III offenders, 8) imposes notification, information sharing, and investigation obligations on the bureau, local law enforcement authorities, and the Department of Corrections regarding offenders who move to Minnesota from other states, 9) requires law enforcement to notify the administrator of a health care facility where a registered sex offender is receiving inpatient care, 10) requires law enforcement to notify child protection agencies if a registered offender is authorized to live in a household where there are children, 11) grants victims the right to notice and the right to submit a statement prior to the release of a sex offender, 12) allows courts to require polygraph tests as a condition of conditional release or probation, D) HUMAN SERVICES ACCESS TO PREDATORY OFFENDER REGISTRY, allows Human Services access to the registry, E) HUMAN SERVICES BACKGROUND STUDIES, 1) prohibits employees shall have a background study completed before having direct contact with clients in DHS licensed facilities or programs, 2) requires immediate removal from positions allowing direct contact with patients when the person's prior background study resulted in an order for immediate renewal and more time is needed to complete a subsequent study, F) METHAMPHETAMINES, 1) prohibits the sale of more than two packages of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine at a time, 2) limits the size of packages that can be sold over the counter to no more than a total of three grams, 3) requires a photo ID to purchase these products, 4) prohibits the purchase of over six grams in a 30 day period, 5) prohibits the sale to anyone under 18, 6) increases fines and prison terms for meth related crimes, 7) requires restitution for meth related controlled substance violations, 8) prohibits the theft of anhydrous ammonia or the purchase of it with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance. This would be a felony with up to five years in prison and/or a $50,000 fine, 9) establishes a crime of knowingly engaging in the manufacturing or storing of Meth in the presence of a child or vulnerable adult. This would be a felony crime with up to a five year prison sentence and/or a $10,000 fine, 10) establishes a meth lab cleanup account and loan program, 11) requires a board of veterinary medicine study and report on animal products that can be used to make meth, G) PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY, 1) modifies the Youth Intervention Program to include mentoring services, 2) provides that when a peace officer or firefighter has been approved to receive a duty-related disability pension, the person may apply to the panel established in the bill for a determination of whether the person meets the requirements for receiving the continued employer contribution health coverage, 3) incerases a variety of brewer and wholesale wine seller fees, 4) increases the state caterer's permit fee from $200 to $300, 5) increases the Lake Superior, St. Croix River and Mississippi River Tour Boat fees and liquor license fees, 6) increases the airline and other common carrier sunday liquor license fees, 7) increases the "sales after 1:00am" permit fees, 8) expands on the current provision in law that prohibits employer retaliation against a victim or witness who takes a "reasonable time off" from work to answer a subpoena or answer the request of a prosecutor, 9) establishes a Homelessness Pilot Project and grant program, H) FIRE MARSHAL, 1) Deletes the requirement that the state fire marshal inform the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension whenever the cause of a fire is determined to be arson, replacing it with a requirement to so inform the law enforcement authority having jurisdiction, typically at the local level of government, 2) Removes the authority of the state fire marshal to delegate summons authority to fire departments in cities of the first and second class, 3) requires lodging facilities with five or more rooms to undergo an inspection by the fire marshal every three years, I) LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICY, 1) authorizes the commissioner of public safety and political subdivisions to reimburse peace officers up to $600 (rather than $300) for the purchase of bulletproof vests, 2) established to provide guidance related to gang and drug crimes, 3) establishes a state "financiel crimes oversight council and task force," 4) requires a state study on human trafficking, J) DNA COLLECTION, Establishes an all felon DNA database in Minnesota. Requires all persons convicted of a felony to submit a DNA sample. Also requires persons arrested for a felony to submit a DNA sample, K) CORRECTIONS, 1) Exempts use of inmates for community services and conservation services from the restrictions on state contracts, 2) establishes correctional officer discipline procedures, 3) adds "supervised release" to the list of offenders eligible for $100 gate money to be paid by the warden or chief executive officer upon leaving prison, 4) establishes a conditional release program and drug treatment program for nonviolent drug offenders, 5) amends the provision in current law that authorizes a local jail to collect local correctional fees only from convicted offenders. Authorizes facilities to charge fees to persons who are under the control and supervision of the facility, 6) prohibits the Fugitive Apprehension Unit from seizing conveyance devices (including motor vehicles and real property) under the forfeiture law that are associated with controlled substance offenses, 7) authorizes sheriffs to use electronic monitoring as an alternative to jail confinement for offenders who are sentenced to work-release. Prohibits offenders convicted of domestic abuse from being electronically monitored, unless the sentencing court directs otherwise. Permits the sheriff to assess the cost of electronic, 8) raises the monetary threshold upon which a county board must pass a resolution and seek the advice of the commissioner of corrections before purchasing, leasing, constructing, or repairing a jail. The threshold would be raised from $5,000 to $15,000, L) COURTS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS, 1) increases tax court fees from $235 to $240, 2) increases the current statutorily mandated criminal surcharge from $60 to $72, and increases the parking violation surcharge from $3 to $4. Permits the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners to authorize imposition of a $1 criminal surcharge for every conviction of a felony, gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor offense, including a parking ticket, 3) increases county recorder fees, 4) increase funding for civil legal services through an increase in surcharges to be collected on certain recording and registration fees, 5) increases registrar of titles fees, 6) prohibits a petition for postconviction relief after a direct appeal has been completed may not be based on grounds that could have been raised on direct appeal, 7) places a two-year limitation period on filing a petition for postconviction relief. The limitation period begins to run after the later of: the entry of judgment if no direct appeal is filed or the appellate court's disposition of a direct appeal, 8) eliminates the prohibition on public defenders accessing the criminal justice information network to obtain information on individuals other than their clients. Allows the public defender to access the network to obtain the criminal record of a witness. Clarifies that the public defender shall have access to data stored via CriMNet or other methods, 9) allows a person to file a petition with the court for the return of seized property if not returned in 48 hours. The court shall send a copy of the petition to the custodian agency and a non-jury hearing shall be heard within 30 days of filing, 10) Authorizes the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to assign a retired court commissioner to act in Ramsey County as a commissioner, M) CHILD PROTECTION, 1) states the commissioner must consent to the adoption if there is no parent qualified to consent. Adds that if the court accepts a parent's consent to adopt as part of a child protection proceeding, the commissioner of human services must also consent, 2) requires that a background check must be completed on: a) a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent who is being assessed for providing day-to-day care of a child who has been temporarily or permanently removed from the home of a parent or guardian under the child protection statutes. A check must also be completed on any household member over the age of 13, if there is reasonable cause to believe the individual has a criminal history or history of maltreatment of a child or vulnerable adult; b) a relative whose suitability for placement is being established and any household member over the age of 13 when the relative must be licensed for foster care; c) a parent following out-of-home placement when the agency has reasonable cause to believe the parent has been convicted of a crime related to the parent's ability to maintain the child's health, safety, or welfare; or the parent is the subject of a investigation, or has been the subject of a substantiated allegation of child or vulnerable adult maltreatment within the past ten years, 3) requires the social services agency shall assess whether a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent is able to care for the child temporarily or permanently and shall complete an assessment that includes background check information, N) CRIMINAL SENTENCING, makes substantive and procedural changes to sentencing law in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). In Blakely, the Court said that it was unconstitutional under a person's sixth amendment right to a jury trial to allow a court to make findings of fact that would increase the sentence for an offense beyond the sentencing guidelines presumptive sentence. The Court held that the government must prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt every aggravating factor that would justify an increase in the defendant's sentence beyond the presumptive sentence (except for the fact of a prior conviction). This part of the bill would increases the presumptive range of sentences allowable under the sentencing guidelines without a departure, establishes procedures to govern a jury's finding of aggravating factors and the court's imposition of an upward departure, and deletes language in various statutes that refers to the court being able to impose a longer sentence on its own, O) GENERAL CRIMINAL PROVISIONS, 1) adds "anabolic steroids" to statutory schedule III drug list, 2) requires the suspension, for 30 days, of the driver's license of any person convicted of the theft of gasoline, 3) imposes a felony penalty on anyone who promotes, engages in, or trains an animal for animal fighting. Imposes a misdemeanor penalty on anyone who purchases a ticket or otherwise gains admissions to an animal fight, 4) adds the crime of domestic assault by strangulation to the list of qualified domestic violence-related offenses, 5) expands the first-degree murder crime that applies when a person causes the death of a minor while committing child abuse to apply when the perpetrator has previously engaged in child abuse against any child, not just the child whose death the perpetrator causes, 6) expands the felony-level crime of fourth degree assault to include certain assaults against those who provide care or treatment to persons held in secure treatment facilities, 7) provides that if any type of domestic assault took place and the offender owns or possesses a firearm and used it in any way during the commission of the assault, the court shall order the firearm be summarily forfeited, 8) establishes penalties (ten years longer than otherwise) for gang members who commit a crime against a child. The underlying crime does not need to be connected to the person's status as a gang member, 9) establishes a crime of knowingly destroying or tampering with documents in furtherance of labor or sex trafficking crimes, 10) expands the definition of "public place" for purposes of the prostitution statutes to include a motor vehicle on a public street, alley, (public) parking lot, or driveway connecting a parking lot with a street or highway, 11) establishes a misdemeanor crime of fleeing from a peace officer in a manner other than in a motor vehicle. It applies if a person attempts to evade or elude a peace officer to avoid arrest, detention, investigation, or to conceal or destroy potential evidence related to a crime, 12) establishes a crime for providing false information to an on-duty peace officer regarding the conduct of others. The crime applies if the person knew the information was false and intended the officer to act in reliance upon it, 13) expands the crime of theft to make it illegal for someone without a legal interest in the property to take the property from someone with a right of possession, 14) creates a new crime that prohibits a person, with intent to obtain another's identity, from using false pretense in an e-mail, Web page, or any other Internet communication. This offense is punishable by five years imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine, and allows for computer forfeiture, 15) prohibits a person from returning to school property, without the principal's consent, within one year after being told by the school's principal or designee to leave and not to return, 16) increases crimes of intruding or interfering with a nother persons privacy by peeping through a window or using an observation device to a gross misdemeanor or a felony if the person installs photographing or recording devices, 17) establishes a crime for a person in a motion picture theater to knowingly operate the audiovisual recording function of a device while a motion picture is being exhibited without the consent of the theater's owner/lessee. A first offense is a misdemeanor, a second offense is a gross misdemeanor, and a third or subsequent offense is a felony (statutory maximum of two years imprisonment and/or $4,000 fine), P) DWI AND TRAFFIC OFFENSES, 1) prohibits operating a vehicle that contains a device that overrides traffic signals (or the possession of such a device), 2) deletes the requirement that, if a second-time DWI offender is sentenced to jail, then that person must serve at least 48 hours of that jail time consecutively. The motion passed in the House (131 to 3) on May 23, 2005. [Vote Details and Comments]
  • Signed by Gov. Tim Pawlenty on June 2, 2005, to make a variety of spending and policy changes to sex offender provisions, fire marshal provisions, emergency communications, law enforcement policy, DNA Collection, Corrections, courts and public defenders, child protection, criminal sentencing, DWI and traffic safety and other general public safety policy. Among the provisions of the bill, this bill would: A) SPENDING; 1) spends $42,196,000 in 2006 and $42,171,000 in 2007 on the Supreme Court, 2) spend $8,189,000 in both 2006 and 2007 on the courts of appeals, 3) spend $231,039,000 in 2006 and $231,386,000 in 2007 on trial courts, 4) spend $726,000 in both years on tax courts, 5) spend $51,000 in 2006 and $45,000 in 2007 on the uniform laws commission, 6) spend $277,000 in both years on the board of judicial standards, 7) spend $60,703,000 in 2006 and $61,801,000 in 2007 on public defense, 8) spend $188,774,000 in 2006 and $126,747,000 in 2007 for the department of public safety, 8) spends $126,000 in both years on the Board of Private Detective and Protective Agent Services, 9) spends $407,085,000 in 2006 and $420,588,000 in 2007 on Corrections, 10) spends $436,000 in both years on sentencing guidelines, and 11) spends $7,000 on the board of veterinary medicine for a meth study, B) SEX OFFENDORS, 1) prohibits the commissioner of corrections from releasing certain other sex offenders until they have served the minimum sentence imposed by the court (usually 20 years in prison). These sex offenders include first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct offenders who commit crimes with force, violence, coercion, use of a weapon, or where personal injury results to the victim and repeat sex offenders, 2) requires the commissioner of corrections to grant supervised release to sex offenders serving life sentences when so directed by the Sex Offender Review Board (SORB), 3) adds the new crime of criminal sexual predatory conduct to the list of crimes that require an offender to serve an additional ten years on conditional release. The statutory maximum would be 25 percent longer for the underlying crime or 50 percent longer if the violation is committed by a person with previous sex offenses. Permits imposition of a fine of not more than $20,000 in addition to any sentence imposed, 4) allows for mandatory life sentences for repeat sex offenders, and egregious first-time offenders if the crime involves "heinour elements" such as torture, intentional infliction of great harm, mutilation, or the use of a dangerous weapon, 5) requires mandatory minimum sentences and specific terms of conditional release, C) SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION, 1) allows programs for adult offenders to include co-payments, and third-party payers, 2) recodifies notification statutes, 3) requires that when a person leaves a primary address and does not have a new one, the person must register with the law enforcement authority in the area where the person is staying within 24 hours of the time the person no longer has a primary address. Requires compliance with this registration process every time the person moves to a new jurisdiction. Requires the person, in lieu of reporting a primary address, to describe the location where the person is staying with as much specificity as possible, 4) requires that, if the person continues to lack a primary address, the person must report in person, on a weekly basis, to the law enforcement agency in the area where the person is staying, 5) requires level II and III predatory offenders who are no longer under correctional supervision to have an annual in-person contact with the law enforcement authority with jurisdiction over where the offender lives, stays or attends school, 6) requires a person who is required to register as a sex offender to notify a health care facility upon the person's admittance to the facility that the person is a registered sex offender, 7) requires a mandatory ten-year conditional release period for released Level III offenders, 8) imposes notification, information sharing, and investigation obligations on the bureau, local law enforcement authorities, and the Department of Corrections regarding offenders who move to Minnesota from other states, 9) requires law enforcement to notify the administrator of a health care facility where a registered sex offender is receiving inpatient care, 10) requires law enforcement to notify child protection agencies if a registered offender is authorized to live in a household where there are children, 11) grants victims the right to notice and the right to submit a statement prior to the release of a sex offender, 12) allows courts to require polygraph tests as a condition of conditional release or probation, D) HUMAN SERVICES ACCESS TO PREDATORY OFFENDER REGISTRY, allows Human Services access to the registry, E) HUMAN SERVICES BACKGROUND STUDIES, 1) prohibits employees shall have a background study completed before having direct contact with clients in DHS licensed facilities or programs, 2) requires immediate removal from positions allowing direct contact with patients when the person's prior background study resulted in an order for immediate renewal and more time is needed to complete a subsequent study, F) METHAMPHETAMINES, 1) prohibits the sale of more than two packages of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine at a time, 2) limits the size of packages that can be sold over the counter to no more than a total of three grams, 3) requires a photo ID to purchase these products, 4) prohibits the purchase of over six grams in a 30 day period, 5) prohibits the sale to anyone under 18, 6) increases fines and prison terms for meth related crimes, 7) requires restitution for meth related controlled substance violations, 8) prohibits the theft of anhydrous ammonia or the purchase of it with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance. This would be a felony with up to five years in prison and/or a $50,000 fine, 9) establishes a crime of knowingly engaging in the manufacturing or storing of Meth in the presence of a child or vulnerable adult. This would be a felony crime with up to a five year prison sentence and/or a $10,000 fine, 10) establishes a meth lab cleanup account and loan program, 11) requires a board of veterinary medicine study and report on animal products that can be used to make meth, G) PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY, 1) modifies the Youth Intervention Program to include mentoring services, 2) provides that when a peace officer or firefighter has been approved to receive a duty-related disability pension, the person may apply to the panel established in the bill for a determination of whether the person meets the requirements for receiving the continued employer contribution health coverage, 3) incerases a variety of brewer and wholesale wine seller fees, 4) increases the state caterer's permit fee from $200 to $300, 5) increases the Lake Superior, St. Croix River and Mississippi River Tour Boat fees and liquor license fees, 6) increases the airline and other common carrier sunday liquor license fees, 7) increases the "sales after 1:00am" permit fees, 8) expands on the current provision in law that prohibits employer retaliation against a victim or witness who takes a "reasonable time off" from work to answer a subpoena or answer the request of a prosecutor, 9) establishes a Homelessness Pilot Project and grant program, H) FIRE MARSHAL, 1) Deletes the requirement that the state fire marshal inform the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension whenever the cause of a fire is determined to be arson, replacing it with a requirement to so inform the law enforcement authority having jurisdiction, typically at the local level of government, 2) Removes the authority of the state fire marshal to delegate summons authority to fire departments in cities of the first and second class, 3) requires lodging facilities with five or more rooms to undergo an inspection by the fire marshal every three years, I) LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICY, 1) authorizes the commissioner of public safety and political subdivisions to reimburse peace officers up to $600 (rather than $300) for the purchase of bulletproof vests, 2) established to provide guidance related to gang and drug crimes, 3) establishes a state "financiel crimes oversight council and task force," 4) requires a state study on human trafficking, J) DNA COLLECTION, Establishes an all felon DNA database in Minnesota. Requires all persons convicted of a felony to submit a DNA sample. Also requires persons arrested for a felony to submit a DNA sample, K) CORRECTIONS, 1) Exempts use of inmates for community services and conservation services from the restrictions on state contracts, 2) establishes correctional officer discipline procedures, 3) adds "supervised release" to the list of offenders eligible for $100 gate money to be paid by the warden or chief executive officer upon leaving prison, 4) establishes a conditional release program and drug treatment program for nonviolent drug offenders, 5) amends the provision in current law that authorizes a local jail to collect local correctional fees only from convicted offenders. Authorizes facilities to charge fees to persons who are under the control and supervision of the facility, 6) prohibits the Fugitive Apprehension Unit from seizing conveyance devices (including motor vehicles and real property) under the forfeiture law that are associated with controlled substance offenses, 7) authorizes sheriffs to use electronic monitoring as an alternative to jail confinement for offenders who are sentenced to work-release. Prohibits offenders convicted of domestic abuse from being electronically monitored, unless the sentencing court directs otherwise. Permits the sheriff to assess the cost of electronic, 8) raises the monetary threshold upon which a county board must pass a resolution and seek the advice of the commissioner of corrections before purchasing, leasing, constructing, or repairing a jail. The threshold would be raised from $5,000 to $15,000, L) COURTS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS, 1) increases tax court fees from $235 to $240, 2) increases the current statutorily mandated criminal surcharge from $60 to $72, and increases the parking violation surcharge from $3 to $4. Permits the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners to authorize imposition of a $1 criminal surcharge for every conviction of a felony, gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor offense, including a parking ticket, 3) increases county recorder fees, 4) increase funding for civil legal services through an increase in surcharges to be collected on certain recording and registration fees, 5) increases registrar of titles fees, 6) prohibits a petition for postconviction relief after a direct appeal has been completed may not be based on grounds that could have been raised on direct appeal, 7) places a two-year limitation period on filing a petition for postconviction relief. The limitation period begins to run after the later of: the entry of judgment if no direct appeal is filed or the appellate court's disposition of a direct appeal, 8) eliminates the prohibition on public defenders accessing the criminal justice information network to obtain information on individuals other than their clients. Allows the public defender to access the network to obtain the criminal record of a witness. Clarifies that the public defender shall have access to data stored via CriMNet or other methods, 9) allows a person to file a petition with the court for the return of seized property if not returned in 48 hours. The court shall send a copy of the petition to the custodian agency and a non-jury hearing shall be heard within 30 days of filing, 10) Authorizes the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to assign a retired court commissioner to act in Ramsey County as a commissioner, M) CHILD PROTECTION, 1) states the commissioner must consent to the adoption if there is no parent qualified to consent. Adds that if the court accepts a parent's consent to adopt as part of a child protection proceeding, the commissioner of human services must also consent, 2) requires that a background check must be completed on: a) a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent who is being assessed for providing day-to-day care of a child who has been temporarily or permanently removed from the home of a parent or guardian under the child protection statutes. A check must also be completed on any household member over the age of 13, if there is reasonable cause to believe the individual has a criminal history or history of maltreatment of a child or vulnerable adult; b) a relative whose suitability for placement is being established and any household member over the age of 13 when the relative must be licensed for foster care; c) a parent following out-of-home placement when the agency has reasonable cause to believe the parent has been convicted of a crime related to the parent's ability to maintain the child's health, safety, or welfare; or the parent is the subject of a investigation, or has been the subject of a substantiated allegation of child or vulnerable adult maltreatment within the past ten years, 3) requires the social services agency shall assess whether a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent is able to care for the child temporarily or permanently and shall complete an assessment that includes background check information, N) CRIMINAL SENTENCING, makes substantive and procedural changes to sentencing law in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). In Blakely, the Court said that it was unconstitutional under a person's sixth amendment right to a jury trial to allow a court to make findings of fact that would increase the sentence for an offense beyond the sentencing guidelines presumptive sentence. The Court held that the government must prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt every aggravating factor that would justify an increase in the defendant's sentence beyond the presumptive sentence (except for the fact of a prior conviction). This part of the bill would increases the presumptive range of sentences allowable under the sentencing guidelines without a departure, establishes procedures to govern a jury's finding of aggravating factors and the court's imposition of an upward departure, and deletes language in various statutes that refers to the court being able to impose a longer sentence on its own, O) GENERAL CRIMINAL PROVISIONS, 1) adds "anabolic steroids" to statutory schedule III drug list, 2) requires the suspension, for 30 days, of the driver's license of any person convicted of the theft of gasoline, 3) imposes a felony penalty on anyone who promotes, engages in, or trains an animal for animal fighting. Imposes a misdemeanor penalty on anyone who purchases a ticket or otherwise gains admissions to an animal fight, 4) adds the crime of domestic assault by strangulation to the list of qualified domestic violence-related offenses, 5) expands the first-degree murder crime that applies when a person causes the death of a minor while committing child abuse to apply when the perpetrator has previously engaged in child abuse against any child, not just the child whose death the perpetrator causes, 6) expands the felony-level crime of fourth degree assault to include certain assaults against those who provide care or treatment to persons held in secure treatment facilities, 7) provides that if any type of domestic assault took place and the offender owns or possesses a firearm and used it in any way during the commission of the assault, the court shall order the firearm be summarily forfeited, 8) establishes penalties (ten years longer than otherwise) for gang members who commit a crime against a child. The underlying crime does not need to be connected to the person's status as a gang member, 9) establishes a crime of knowingly destroying or tampering with documents in furtherance of labor or sex trafficking crimes, 10) expands the definition of "public place" for purposes of the prostitution statutes to include a motor vehicle on a public street, alley, (public) parking lot, or driveway connecting a parking lot with a street or highway, 11) establishes a misdemeanor crime of fleeing from a peace officer in a manner other than in a motor vehicle. It applies if a person attempts to evade or elude a peace officer to avoid arrest, detention, investigation, or to conceal or destroy potential evidence related to a crime, 12) establishes a crime for providing false information to an on-duty peace officer regarding the conduct of others. The crime applies if the person knew the information was false and intended the officer to act in reliance upon it, 13) expands the crime of theft to make it illegal for someone without a legal interest in the property to take the property from someone with a right of possession, 14) creates a new crime that prohibits a person, with intent to obtain another's identity, from using false pretense in an e-mail, Web page, or any other Internet communication. This offense is punishable by five years imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine, and allows for computer forfeiture, 15) prohibits a person from returning to school property, without the principal's consent, within one year after being told by the school's principal or designee to leave and not to return, 16) increases crimes of intruding or interfering with a nother persons privacy by peeping through a window or using an observation device to a gross misdemeanor or a felony if the person installs photographing or recording devices, 17) establishes a crime for a person in a motion picture theater to knowingly operate the audiovisual recording function of a device while a motion picture is being exhibited without the consent of the theater's owner/lessee. A first offense is a misdemeanor, a second offense is a gross misdemeanor, and a third or subsequent offense is a felony (statutory maximum of two years imprisonment and/or $4,000 fine), P) DWI AND TRAFFIC OFFENSES, 1) prohibits operating a vehicle that contains a device that overrides traffic signals (or the possession of such a device), 2) deletes the requirement that, if a second-time DWI offender is sentenced to jail, then that person must serve at least 48 hours of that jail time consecutively.

Line

Comments

Introduced by Rep. Jim Abeler, Rep. Michael Beard, Rep. Fran Bradley, Rep. Laura Brod, Rep. Tony Cornish, Rep. Lloyd Cybart, Rep. Randy Demmer, Rep. Tom Emmer, Rep. Sondra Erickson, Rep. Brad Finstad, Rep. Pat Garofalo, Rep. Paul Gazelka, Rep. Bob Gunther, Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, Rep. Joe Hoppe, Rep. Paul Kohls, Rep. Morrie Lanning, Rep. John Lesch, Rep. Doug Magnus, Rep. Doug Meslow, Rep. Peter Nelson, Rep. Erik Paulsen, Rep. Maxine Penas, Rep. Joyce Peppin, Rep. Connie Ruth, Rep. Char Samuelson, Rep. Dan Severson, Rep. Dean Simpson, Rep. Steve Smith, Rep. Barb Sykora, Rep. Kathy Tingelstad, Rep. Tim Wilkin and Rep. Kurt Zellers on January 6, 2005. Passed in the House (123 to 10) on April 28, 2005. New Comment

1) [by Anonymous Citizen on July 18, 2008]
dwindling drops carbonizers Evangeline Injuns accept cowardice
Reply New Comment

Line

2) [by Anonymous Citizen on June 3, 2007]
unquestionably repast!landmark sarcasm reflective,... Thanks!!!
Reply New Comment

Line

3) Callousness [by Anonymous Citizen on September 28, 2006]
Our country is becoming more and more callous. We used to call people ex-cons...implying they did their time, now let them get on with their frickin lives. Now we call them "offenders" and they must be punished with a scarlett letter the rest of their living days!! The Bible says in the last days men's hearts will grow cold, and I believe it!!
Reply New Comment

Line

4) You are right [by Anonymous Citizen on October 4, 2006]
"Ex-con" is a great term for someone who committed a crime, did their time, and isn't likely to offend again.

However, "repeat offender" is a much more accurate term for sex offenders, who are very likely to repeat again and again and again until they are chemically castrated.

Like Dru Sjodin's killer, and that guy who just killed all the Amish school girls in Pennsylvania. Both REPEAT OFFENDERS.
Reply New Comment

Line

5) Right Wingers playing this for all it's worth [by Anonymous Citizen on September 28, 2006]
The right wingers have been playing the sex offender thing for all it's worth. Only in the right wing world does it make sense to lump a 20 year old man who had a 16 year old g/f in with 50 year old men that victimized small children. Such is the case with current sex offender laws.
Reply New Comment

Line

6) Re: Right Wingers playing this... [by Anonymous Citizen on October 4, 2006]
You are correct that right wingers care more about their children than liberals, but this isn't just a liberal or conservative issue.

All children deserve protection from predators, regardless of parents political affiliation.
Reply New Comment

Line

7) Castration? How idiotic!!!! [by Anonymous Citizen on July 29, 2006]
Unfortunately, castration would only create a whole new group of vicious people who have had their rights taken away from them. Yes they do have rights, once they served their time for their crime, their civil rights have been restored to them. If a person (any person) chooses to be a parent, they have that right. We have laws that prevent hysterectomies from being done on mentally retarded females, (they can be very dangerous to an infant or child), so why should anyone else lose their rights to the same thing.
Reply New Comment

Line

8) Re: castration!! how idiotic!! [by Anonymous Citizen on September 22, 2006]
The difference is not a subtle one, but you may have missed it anyway. A mentally challenged person is innocent, whereas a sexual offender is displaying predatory behavior, and is therefore guilty.

That's why castration is an excellent idea, especially for predators displaying repeat behavior.
Reply New Comment

Line

9) Castration, like that will work.. [by Anonymous Citizen on October 4, 2006]
All this talk about castration is just plain rediculous. What good will that do? A lot, probably over half, of the offenses don't even involve the man's penis anyway. There is many cases of penetration with a finger, and object, etc. A lot of times its not the plain and simple act of sexual pleasure that involves the man's equipment.

So you start castrating sex offenders, whoopy doo, then they will just be angry and turn to other violations of the victims body.

You need to treat the mind not the body. And how about some education for these underage girls/boys that keep dropping their pants for them in the first place? It's not too often that i read of a case where the victim was violently attacked and clothing ripped off, etc. Most of the time they are talked into it!


Reply New Comment

Line

10) Victim?????? [by Anonymous Citizen on May 5, 2006]
How is there a victim in a relationship between a 16/18 year old that was consenual? That's in one state, but in another state that relationship is legal. So how can you say it is so terrible that in one state you become a sex offender and in another is aok? Doesn't seem right to me. There is no reasoning to the laws in situations such as this. You can urinate behind a bush and become a sex offender. Let's get real. Who are we protecting? I'm not sure the sex offender registry protects anyone. But I am sure people guilty of the above offenses and offenses like those do not belong in catergory of sex offender.
Reply New Comment

Line

11) Lifetime registration is NOT" A Life Sentence". [by Anonymous Citizen on March 3, 2006]
The victim is the one with the lifetime sentence.
Reply New Comment

Line

12) Oh god.... [by Anonymous Citizen on June 3, 2008]
Shut up with that already. I was abused for 7 years! I choose not to dwell on it forever, or for my "life sentence", and further choose not to "milk" being a victim in the public's eye. Think its long overdue the "victims" take a lesson....
Reply New Comment

Line

13) Then you go volunteer [by Justice4All on March 3, 2006]
your name for the list.
Reply New Comment

Line

14) Yes it is right to lable him for life [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
He altered his victim for life, why should she be the only one with permanent change.
Reply New Comment

Line

15) Him? what about Her? [by Anonymous Citizen on September 28, 2006]
automatically assume all offenders are male? 30% of offenders are female, according to many studies. Even though only 1-4% of the sex offender list are female. Talk about gender inequality!!! I guess that's why 35% of the military are female and only 2% of Iraqi deaths are female. But they have to be paid the same!!! The only inequality in this country is against men...
Reply New Comment

Line

16) Blah [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
Blah Blah. Keep abusing these laws! I see what is coming, and soon you will too! Pretty soon every Hannible Lechtor MSOP has will be free to further victimize people. I bet you idiots will feel wonderful then won't you?
Reply New Comment

Line

17) "MSOP has will be free to further victimize people" [by Anonymous Citizen on February 25, 2006]
When you said "Pretty soon every Hannible Lechtor MSOP has will be free to further victimize people"-do you really mean that victimization comes from Probation Officers. Thanks for teaching me as I thought Victimization came from sexual abusers. Are you still saying you are not a sexual offender, as you clearly are, unless regular citizins think victimization comes from probation officers. You should tell your PO that he is a victimizer, and tell his supervisor and your Judge too.
Reply New Comment

Line

18) See....This is how intelligent peole are [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
When I said "pretty soon every Hannible Lechtor MSOP has will be free" I meant if these laws continue to be abused like they are it won't be long before a court tosses out the SPP/SDP law all together, just as the supreme court did in 1993 with the PP law, thus releasing Linehan. SDP/SPP came very close again with Kansas vs. Crane. Keep pushing this and I fear you will not like the final outcome. All I was saying is should that happen, everyone of those men who do belong there (the ones with multiple violent offenses) will be released and be free to further victimize. Don't think so? I beg to differ. Keep pushing to lock the wrong ones up and mark my words the Courts will not look the other way forever. PS: I suppose you are free to call me whatever you want. I have resolved to the fact that anyone who does not support your clouded vision of things will be branded a sex offender come hell or high water. So if it makes you feel any better, I will acknowledge here, for the record that I get your message about feeling i'm a sex offender. You all, look not only silly and childish by attempting to draw the attention away from the FACTS I am presenting here, you also sound like broken records! Try and post something with some substance to it - make an intellegible argument - try and convey your passion about this issue like adults - not like children screaming "uhuh - we are right! you don't agree so you must be a big ole sex offender!" Think about that before your next rant about who is or who isint a sex offender in an attempt to block discussion of the real issue! Please, thank you.
Reply New Comment

Line

19) Children are being abused, not the law. [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
You think its the laws that are being abused, no, its children that are being abused.Its funny how some people will not use the word "abuse" to describe a behavior when it is an appropriate (such as the sexual abuse of a child). Then when they feel they are abused (but are really just being held "accountable" they break out the word it looks like they forgot "abuse". Why don't you lable your behavior twords children as "abuse".
Reply New Comment

Line

20) Maybe You ........ [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
need to lable your actions toward children (since you appear to be the real pedo accusing others of being the same while you masquerade as a "child advocate") to "MISLEADING". Yes - I stand by my statement that these laws are being abused. As hash as it may sound no matter how many people you use my tax dollars to frivolously lock away, there will always be sex crimes and there will always be victims, and unfortunity, child victims. Another thing that will ALWAYS remain is the law. I am not about to simply toss out hundreds of years of building a system of law where there are RIGHTS. RIGHTS for victims and OFFENDERS, regardless of the stature of their crime. I will not let mass hysteria and recent sensationalism blind or distort what I know about the law and the HISTORY of the law. These offenders MAKE their choices to commit these crimes. I don't belive for a second that any true sex offender can be "treated" or "cured". Not for one second. So why should I support something as foolish as subjecting people to DOUBLE JEOPARDY, something that is discussed from the earlies law, and pretend that I am putting these people away for "treatment" which does not work? There is a system people - if some freak goes out and commits "abuse" like this then they go to prison. When they come out the law says they are absolved of that crime. Like it or not, that is the way it is. Those same offenders choose to go out and do it again, then back to prison they go. If someone wants to introduce much longer sentences for these crimes, or even make it a life sentence for a second time offender, I will jump on that bandwagon in a heartbeat!!! But I will NEVER support placing someone in a second prison when their sentence is over and lie calling it treatment. Answer this: Should you suceed in your mission (highly doubt it) of locking up each and every sex offender and you have ridden Minnesota (which consequently is flat ass broke from "treating" 500,000 people for nothing) of sex crime - what group of offenders in the crime pool will the witch hunt focus on then? Property offenders? Ah, I can see it now - the Minnesota Property Offender Treatment Program (MPOTP)
Reply New Comment

Line

21) Own your behavior [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
Stop getting so mad at everyone else, you made all your troubles. Its time to grow up and stop beinf a crybaby over the consequences you created and earned.
Reply New Comment

Line

22) Let me guess???? [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
You must work for MSOP? LMAO!!!!
Reply New Comment

Line

23) Close [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
I do not but I can see why you would think I deal with child molesters five days a week, which I do. If you did not know, your posts are equally transparent. I am trying to figure out exactly what your offences were. I probly cannot get it exactly but I can see you do not understand the harm you created and you still blame others for what you created.
Reply New Comment

Line

24) Ok - I'll bite....... [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
I can see how one could easily assume that a person with a wealth of knowledge about sex offender issues who from mis-perception appears to be defending sex offenders would in fact be a sex offender themselves. I will give you that. However, I am not that close-minded and I have the ability to interact and coversate with people. I would like to think that even if I initially suspected a posing offender, that I would be able to use my interaction and communication skills to grasp the "true" tone of a persons position. (e.g. is this person here out right defending what sex offenders do, defending sex offender actions in a passive manner OR is this person here defending a set of historical rights and due processes that are given to everyone, even the less desired people, and in the present case happens to be fighting for equal applications of those rights and due processes even though it may be in regards to a sex offender) This will be the LAST TIME I address the issue of of my status as an alleged sex offender. As I believe this accusation is regularly slung at anyone who will not support the position that all sex offenders should be burned at the stake. NO - I am not a sex offender. I am however, someone who works with them also, just somewhat on the other side of the issue. Some of my civil rights clients happen to be sex offenders at MSOP and some are facing that possibility. NEVER have any of you heard me defend the act of a sex offense in any way. I am about constitution, law and rights. RIGHTS of everyday citizens, RIGHTS of victims, RIGHTS of criminals (accused and convicted) and yes, even RIGHTS of sex offenders. You won't hear me say we need to relax those criminal sexual conduct charging laws or that we need to relax those robbery laws etc.. you WILL hear me defend LAW, RIGHTS & DUE PROCESS.

As to your claim that you are a sex offender treatment professional? I think you are being a little less than candid about that one?!?! The things that lead me to believe your lying are: Most, if not all of the SO treatment professionals I have dealt with paid attention in college/training. They do not refer to all sex offenders as "child molesters". The ones I know did pay attention in class and are very consistent in identifying the different groups/types a particular offender belongs to as their professional knowledge allows them the ability to set aside hate or distain and do their jobs. RARELY have I met one who will simply group them all as "child molesters". This kind of talk is not that of a professional - but of someone with enough hate (or whatever feeling) to view all sex offenders as child molesters as they do not have the capacity to distinguish the different types of offenders. (Oh yes - there is more than one kind) Perhaps your most revealing action, tending to expose your dishonesty was this - ANY sex offender treatment professional (or anyone with a high school education) would know how to write sex OFFENSE and not SEX OFFENCE Every profession has some words a person could spell in their sleep. I would hope a sex offender treatment professional could spell sex offense. But since I am not above the occasional typo, I will leave conclusions to the individual readers. That is the beauty of BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. However, with that point and my previous argument about your apparent lack of professional conduct I think I have at least a CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE case?

In closing, since you feel free to analyze me, here is mine: You are either bitter victim yourself who chose to do nothing to recover from the crime that was perpetrated upon you and that you are content to stay a victim who wollows and comes to message boards to accuse people of being offenders rather than dealing with being a victim and moving on as best you can to maybe even TRULY help other victims recover instead of randomly pointing your finger and screaming "OFFENDER!"

So what do you think? Am I close? I think I am. My only other thought was that if your not the person I described above - you know someone like that and it hurts you to see them in that condition and it causes your irrational thought patterns and behaviors? Try the TRUTH now?
Reply New Comment

Line

25) Why I said child molester rather than sex offender [by Anonymous Citizen on February 25, 2006]
The reason I used the term child molester is all the offenders here are rationalizing thier offences because the victim was underage but in agreement with the offense. If there were persons here rationalizing force then I would say rapist, if ther were persons rationalizing taking pornographic pictures of children I would say child porn producers. Look over the board, I could not find anyone who addmitted they engaged in any other offense besides being with a child they described as wanting to be with them, thats called child molester thinking. If there were men describing how some women just need some force to convince them you would see me write "rapist". Also persons in the field say "offender" rather than always saying "sex offender" . Every field abbreviates and mine is no exception. I admit my spelling is horrible. I use microsoft word and it atrophied the spelling that I did have, and the software for this board does not have spellcheck. Like an offender I am blaming others for my errors.
Reply New Comment

Line

26) OH! and PS: [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
Since in your world rights and due process don't matter and proof is a thing of the past - I hereby determine that based the errors in your story I pointed out, I hereby ORDER you to register as a liar for LIFE. Regardless of what kind of lie you told your status as a registered liar shall be made public matter and posted on the internet. We feel we must protect our children from the influence of registered liars! I could go on and on - but I think you get the point?
Reply New Comment

Line

27) By The Way.... [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
Thanks for proving me right! You have no intellegable means of making a even mildly valid response argument, so you resort to trying to cause distractions with your little "wish list" (which I will bet my life will never pass - as most of the latest hysteria laws have not!) You may be able to get others on this MB with your rants to their posts, but not me! Call me whatever you want, but pay attention, my office will be filing suit against MN here soon enough, then I am really going to show MN how to spend their tax dollars! Paying back all the "offenders" who have been wrongly detained! Boy thats going to be salt in the wounds huh? Because MN's pussy lawyers won't even put up a fight (sadly) they will just settle because they won't want any "bad press". ROTFLMFAO!!!!!! Chew on that one a while!?!?
Reply New Comment

Line

28) I "l bet my life will never pass" [by Anonymous Citizen on February 25, 2006]
Well it would effect you more than me. I would not be so confident. Even you know how much has changed in the last 10 years. You have to admit its all new and who knows where it will end.
Reply New Comment

Line

29) Its affect not effect and.... [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
I seem to be dectecting that you are once again implying I must be a sex offender by stating it will "effect" me more than you?

I partially agree with you - these laws have changed a lot in the last 10 years. I use to think we were heading in the right direction in that regard, committing repeat, violent sexual offenders to MSOP and effecting (this would be the context in which to use that spelling) adequate supervision of the common offender in the community. Then there was Dru, an agency who blew it bad and released Hannible's cousin Alfonso, and two pussy politicians who didn't want to loose any votes. (Talk about people who need to accept responsibility?) That is when this all went way over the top and brought about the biggest bout of mass hysteria this State (maybe even country) has seen in a long time. So, as I see it we are now way in debt, taking money from other critical state services to continue to finance this madness and are not one damn bit safer because of it. I guess its fair for you to say no one really knows where things will be when the smoke clears, but I do know that I can already see things starting to cave (even if its a little) and its going to be a mess. If I am wrong and madness prevails, well hey, I said I'd bet my life so come get it. However, I am not even close to thinking I need to be shopping for a casket just yet!
Reply New Comment

Line

30) Avoiding bad press? [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
How can giving taxpayer money to angry sexual abusers be avoiding bad press. There could not be worse press than giving hard earned taxpayer dollers to persons who feel entitled to sexually abuse children.
Reply New Comment

Line

31) What the hell is your deal? [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
Are you just acting like you are that dumb? Or did hooked on phonics not work for you and you truly have stumbled into a MB that is WAY out of your comprehension level? You really could not gather what I meant by avoiding "bad press"? Whew! Ok - let me get into say 8th grade mode here.....one second.....give me time.....ok!

I guess I assumed anyone who knows anything about civil laws or works in said field would know that in many, many cases where there is a clear fault of the defendant in a suit (Such as the State of Minnesota unlawfully detaining citizens - some for years with nothing more than mis-application of a law as its basis) they will 9 times out of 10 elect to settle as settlements are much more quiet as opposed to say, a public trial where the defendant will be publicly exposed for their wrong, and then be ordered to pony up the dough! Are ya gettin' it now?

Since everyone here seems to purport they are so up on these laws and whatnot, can anyone here answer me as to even roughly how many cases regarding these sex offender issues are currently in litigation? I am betting no? Anyone?
Reply New Comment

Line

32) What does ROTFLMFAO mean? [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
Again I have ne idea
Reply New Comment

Line

33) ROTFLMFAO- [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
I get ROTFLMFAO now "rolling on the floor laughing my f$%^@#$ a&& off". What I do not get is why a person in your position would ever be able to laugh as
1-You are registered sex offender
2-Your bitter about the way your life has played out
3-Its not going to get better for you.
Reply New Comment

Line

34) You can't possibly be this dumb? [by Justice4All on February 25, 2006]
HELLO? McFly? are you in there? Is that your tactic for everything in life? In place of defending your opinion or belief with civil, intelligent communication you rant on an on (an on) about the person challenging you having to be a sex offender? If that is all the you can do I predict the people who are pulling for legal application of laws will win by a landslide!

Just out of curiosity - does that "your an offender" line work for you a lot? If it does I think I'll go to court on Monday and wait for a sex case. If the judge rules for an offender based on the law, I am going to stand up and scream "WHAT? Your ruling in favor of the law? YOU MUST BE AN OFFENDER!, get your ass off that bench!" I'll keep you posted on how that goes over in the real world ok? :)
Reply New Comment

Line

35) "my office" ? [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
Please school me as to what office you control. I can admit I have no clue.
Reply New Comment

Line

36) Look at the Feb 14th Posts [by Anonymous Citizen on February 23, 2006]
They are all from the same person, posted on the same day, by a person posing as "multiple" people, all violently opposed to protecting our children from sex offenders.

This website does not see more than 3 posts per WEEK on average, and yet all those posts came on the same day. That is the PROOF.

Also quite interesting that the person didn't have any plans on Feb 14th?! Most people were out with their wives, husbands, or dates. What was this person doing, looking for a minor to take out?

People, do not be FOOLED. There are 1 or 2 imposters on this board, and I am totally convinced that they are intentionally misrepresenting themselves, to try to seem like a large group of people who are in consensus. Don't fall for it.

Don't forget Dru. We need to get tougher on these laws.
Reply New Comment

Line

37) You are really a fool..... [by Anonymous Citizen on February 24, 2006]
So now you know who is a poser and who is not? I made all of the posts on the 14th, with the exception of the reply to "you go girl". Where did ya park the squad car dick tracy? I don't have to misrepresent anything to make it seem like some "large" group in agreement. There is an equal (ah ok - slightly smaller) group of Minnesota citzens who share in my outrage at how my tax dollars are being spent not to lock up the "worst of the worst" like the lying sector of our State Government purports, but the KIDS this loon, who seems to dominate this MB is constantly ranting about protecting? I am all for locking up predatory offenders IN PRISON where they belong. For every 5 KIDS we lock away in that joke called MSOP, 10 violent offenders are released. (Compare the offense descriptions on the MN DOC offender site with the current MSOP commitment cases on the states judicial website and I promise you a much different picture than this idiot spouts) I have to wonder though - as much as you rant and call others posers and predators, ARE YOU possibly the UNDERCOVER pedo? It has been my experience several times in life that people who take off on such over-the-top campaigns (like yourself) end up being the real pedo pretending to be a child advocate. Sound familiar? Huh? At any rate, I can understand your desire to protect the innocent and I share that desire, however, it is entirely clear that anyone who does not share your false sense of security and KNOWS the impact these laws are NOT having on dropping any sex crime rates, will be attacked with childish balderdash. But mark my words, these mis-guided laws WILL have backlash. It will be a damn shame if the SPP/SDP laws get tossed all together (like in most other states) because of people who really need to rent some brains and use them! What was that? Remember Dru? How about remember DRU and the thousands of other victims who died before DRU and the hysteria which followed? or does Dru's death erase all the other victims? Idiots like you are going to push it to far though I can see, and when the smoke clears I hope you all wish we would have used these SPP/SDP laws with common sense and not ignorance in masses!!!!
Reply New Comment

Line

38) RE: you go girl!!!! [by Anonymous Citizen on February 16, 2006]
I agree 100% with you. The laws need to change and we need to stop giving people a label for such ridiculous reasons. Did you know you can get that label or have to go to sex offender treatment for mooning someone? WTF??? An 18 year old can be labeled for having sex with a 17 year old??? I mean come on... I'm all for protection of a people, but the punishment needs to fit the crime. We've all made mistakes even you the person reading this. How would you like to get your license taken away for life cuz you blew a red light?? Think about it.....
Reply New Comment

Line

39) Re: re: You go Girl [by Anonymous Citizen on February 23, 2006]
OK, I'm going to start spotlighting the distortions and outright lies of the organized activist (probably a sex offenders themself) who is posing as multiple normal people on this thread.

Lie #2: You will be forced to register as a sex offender for mooning someone.

Also totally false. Again, it's a misdemeanor charge for public lewdness. You must really think people on here are fools to try to pass off that whopper.
Reply New Comment

Line

40) RE: RE: RE:You go girl [by Anonymous Citizen on February 25, 2006]
I'm curious if you know what your even talkin about. Yes you can be ordered into sex offender treatment and have to register for mooning or exposing any part of your private area.. I know this for a fact. Do some research.. Look up the case files.. Dam half these post sound like a bunch of 2year olds fighting over the last fruit loop. The laws need to be inforced but the public needs to be able to understand them as well.
Reply New Comment

Line

41) They do not send persons to Sex Offender Treatment for mooning or urinating [by Anonymous Citizen on February 26, 2006]
While they nevr , ever sent persons to sex offender treatment for urinating in public many exhibitionists make the false claim that they were just urinating when in fact they were exposing themselves and masterbating "at" some woman (even a man or a child sometimes). Some witness has to say he was doing this kind of behavior, and I have never seen a case where it was not some poor citizen forced to see this--so don't say the police make it up. The lie that stupid pranks or innocent errors cause you to be on the registry is put out there by persons who